This game was similar in some ways. His opening choice wasn't very successful, but I started seeing ghosts and lost the thread completely. This time though I fought back hard and even got to the brink of a winning position - only to revert to a more ordinary script:
It's reassuring to know that I haven't suddenly forgotten how to outplay 190s; as ever, I had far more problems playing against myself. Nor did I stumble into a position where normal chess logic ceases to apply - Black has given me too much rope after 13 moves to get a good game just by sticking a couple of rooks vaguely near my king. The position that arose after 18. e6! is fascinating in its own way, and is a powerful illustration of what the two bishops can achieve. I suppose it's fair in a way given how much compensation I was pre-emptively given in the opening.
No doubt the result of my previous five games had a bearing on my mental state, which is starting to reach ridiculous lows. Even so, I need to have more confidence in my position's resources than I showed on move 14 (I had the usual thing where the opponent is given half a dozen moves in a row), and to get the best results I need to forget the backstory of a game. Kramnik mentioned in an interview once how Karpov would so often get a dreary game, and labour for many hours to gradually equalise. At this point, Kramnik said, anyone else would happily agree a draw - Karpov meanwhile would start playing for a win! And playing for a win from the end position of this game would not have been difficult.
It seems that, like some sort of chess vampire, I need a constant diet of innocent weaker players to keep my belief going. I got an opportunity at the next CCF Superleague fixture, which again followed hot on the heels of this game.
No comments:
Post a Comment